This issue is difficult. Should we spend nearly a million dollars more to provide 35% minority/small business a break or go with the lowest bidder? What works better, giving a non-minority owned company a more expensive contract that provides 35% to be a combination of 35% of minority/small businesses, or to save money that could be spent on other programs in the city?
What are the implications of the court ruling from Nelson, declaring parts of the city ordinance unconstitutional?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't be an idiot or your comment will be deleted.